The questions I asked were revised a few times. I can't talk about privacy without mentioning the Patriot Act. I can't talk about the Patriot Act without mentioning 9/11. And I'm not suppose to talk about 9/11 unless I'm agreeing with the 9/11 Commission Report. I disagree almost entirely, so I decided to ask questions regarding the holes in the Commission Report. I apologize if these questions seem irrelevant to some/all of you. But in my eyes they need to be answered and proven with irrefutable evidence.
1) Why wasn't building 7 mentioned in the Commission report?
This was the 3rd building that collapsed on 9/11 that wasn't hit by anything, but caught "friendly fire" and somehow toppled over in a convenient pile on top of itself. This building housed government agencies that held many important records.
2) Why were so many put options placed on United Airlines leading up to the events of September 11th?
Put options basically mean the chances of a certain stock to go down. It is assessed by analysts daily and American Airlines was something like over 10 times its daily average of put options on the morning of September 11th. Coincidence? Maybe..
3) If a Boeing 757 did in fact crash land into The Pentagon, why won't any official release the FULL video footage reflecting that?
If you look at the building, there is a hole...one hole. No damage from wings, tail, engine, nothing. Just a hole. When questions started to arise because of this, the FBI released 5 still images that didn't come close to depicting A Boeing 757 or anything at all. Just an explosion. Later, they released a 2 second video footage. Again, it is impossible to discern what kindof object hit the Pentagon. And coincidentally the "plane" hit the one spot of the building that just been renovated strictly for the purpose of sustaining the impact of a plane (or missile)
4) Why were no human body parts found at the crash landing of Flight 93 in Pennsylvania?
Yes you read me right. Research if you don't believe me. A coroner showed up at the scene and left ten minutes later empty handed.
5) Did you even read the Commission Report?
Sometimes you have to ask the obvious questions to get anywhere with politicians.
6) Are you For or Against the Patriot Act? Why or why not?
7) To put this in perspective. Would you be alright with me invading your home--legally, and without probable cause--in the middle of the day to spy on your downloads and recent purchases and all of your private information?
Hopefully now they are all against the Patriot Act for obvious reasons.
8) How important is this issue to you in comparison to the more apparent popular issues that are being discussed?
9) If elected, how will you go about achieving the promises you make? In precise steps, explain.
So many candidates create this illusion that everything is going to be alright, that the world will somehow be at complete peace if only you would vote for them. But since Lincoln, what has happened that has been revolutionary? Anything? Anyone?
And backtracking a little bit...but an astonishing rhetorical question...
10) Did you know that the World Trade Towers and that Building 7 are the only 3 buildings in world history to have completely collapsed due to a fire?
Just to bring you back to how ridiculous this is to me and hundreds of thousands of other Americans.
So there you go. Feel free to respond/comment. I hope I have informed some of you. And I hope I have confused some of you so that you might feel inclined to ask a few questions. Thanks for reading.
Friday, January 25, 2008
Thursday, January 17, 2008
Ron Paul
Ron Paul is an advocate of privacy and personal liberty to the citizens of the Unites States. He covers a wide range of categories regarding this issue, including voting against the National ID system that would be potentially printed on all of our drivers licenses to essentially tighten the leash the government has on us and our daily activities. Another is the medical "security" we supposedly have. You may think your information is confidential when you go in to treat your STD (or whatever you have, I'm just using an embarrassing example to help prove my point) but in fact insurance companies and other entities have that access to your personal medical information. Ron Paul would fight against that and help ensure our privacy. But the biggest issue is the privacy stripped from us was derived from the attacks of 9/11. The big whigs implemented the Patriot Act and might as well have adopted the ideals of communism and built large walls around our borders. This is the issue I have been most passionate about since knowing anything about our lovely government. And by lovely I mean a group of adult children that have unlimited sums of money and a God complex. Maybe you are not aware of what all the Rich White Man Act entails. Here are a few fun facts about it to help you sleep at night:
Expanded the federal government’s ability to use wiretaps without judicial oversight;
Allowed nationwide search warrants non-specific to any given location, nor subject to any local judicial oversight;
Made it far easier for the government to monitor private internet usage;
Authorized “sneak and peek” warrants enabling federal authorities to search a person’s home, office, or personal property without that person’s knowledge; and
Required libraries and bookstores to turn over records of books read by their patrons.
I can't help but think HOW IS THIS LEGAL?!?! Is it not a direct contradiction to the constitution in about 40 different ways? I can't believe this Act is still enforced and I can't believe it even passed. And more, I can't believe I have come this far in the blog without typing one cuss word. We have now been trained to live in fear of terrorism. They even made us a really awesome chart that identifies exactly what level of fear we should experience! Remember watching the news and they would have a segment of some asshole with bad hair point to the digital diagram of an arrow pointing in some shade of orange and say with a plastic smile, "Today's terrorist threat level is moderately high! And now, the weather!" And people bought this. And they feared it. And nobody thought to ask "how did they come to this conclusion today?" That's the problem. Our lack of interest and social duty to question our management and get involved with these issues has led to this level of fear. And now you can't even buy a book without some third party analyzing why you bought it and are you a potential hazard to society and when do you leave for work so they can invade your HOME to see what's on your hard drive. Is this ridiculous to anyone else??? Ron Paul thinks so. And he has done everything in his powers to overturn this. I believe we need somebody like him in office to restore confidence in ourselves and our country.
Now, I realize that some people have good intentions for all of this. Some people would utilize this Act to actually prevent another attack. But the further you research our questionable past, the more you realize the intentions the Whigs really have. I suspect this will spark some debate and maybe you think I'm a tool, which is your right and even through all my bitching I can't tell you how happy I am that I still have the right to call the Bush Administration the anti-christ, and you have the right to completely disagree with me.
If you have a minute, go to this link and watch the trailer. It might help you understand what I'm saying:
http://loosechange911.com/
Expanded the federal government’s ability to use wiretaps without judicial oversight;
Allowed nationwide search warrants non-specific to any given location, nor subject to any local judicial oversight;
Made it far easier for the government to monitor private internet usage;
Authorized “sneak and peek” warrants enabling federal authorities to search a person’s home, office, or personal property without that person’s knowledge; and
Required libraries and bookstores to turn over records of books read by their patrons.
I can't help but think HOW IS THIS LEGAL?!?! Is it not a direct contradiction to the constitution in about 40 different ways? I can't believe this Act is still enforced and I can't believe it even passed. And more, I can't believe I have come this far in the blog without typing one cuss word. We have now been trained to live in fear of terrorism. They even made us a really awesome chart that identifies exactly what level of fear we should experience! Remember watching the news and they would have a segment of some asshole with bad hair point to the digital diagram of an arrow pointing in some shade of orange and say with a plastic smile, "Today's terrorist threat level is moderately high! And now, the weather!" And people bought this. And they feared it. And nobody thought to ask "how did they come to this conclusion today?" That's the problem. Our lack of interest and social duty to question our management and get involved with these issues has led to this level of fear. And now you can't even buy a book without some third party analyzing why you bought it and are you a potential hazard to society and when do you leave for work so they can invade your HOME to see what's on your hard drive. Is this ridiculous to anyone else??? Ron Paul thinks so. And he has done everything in his powers to overturn this. I believe we need somebody like him in office to restore confidence in ourselves and our country.
Now, I realize that some people have good intentions for all of this. Some people would utilize this Act to actually prevent another attack. But the further you research our questionable past, the more you realize the intentions the Whigs really have. I suspect this will spark some debate and maybe you think I'm a tool, which is your right and even through all my bitching I can't tell you how happy I am that I still have the right to call the Bush Administration the anti-christ, and you have the right to completely disagree with me.
If you have a minute, go to this link and watch the trailer. It might help you understand what I'm saying:
http://loosechange911.com/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
